Teen Sentenced to 4 Years for Burglary Saw His Prison Term Grow to 2085 After Repeated Escapes

Theme:
Font Size:
24px

Marry.

Have children.

Grow old outside prison.

Now imagine repeatedly adding time until your release date moves beyond your natural lifespan.

That is essentially what happened to DeFriest.

His escapes and additional offenses kept accumulating.

Eventually, his potential release date reached 2085.

If he had actually remained imprisoned until then, he would have been 124 years old.

The date functioned as a life sentence in everything but name.

A case that had begun with a teenager taking mechanic's tools his father had left him had become an incarceration stretching across generations.

But it would be misleading to say that he received nearly a century solely for taking those tools.

He did not.

The original case began the process.

His escapes, crimes committed during some of those escapes, and repeated disciplinary problems dramatically expanded it.

That distinction is essential.

The tragedy of the story lies precisely in that snowball effect.

Solitary Confinement

The length of DeFriest's imprisonment was only one part of the punishment.

Much of it was spent alone.

According to Gabriel London's research for The Mind of Mark DeFriest, DeFriest spent approximately 27 of his first 34 years of incarceration in solitary confinement.

Twenty-seven years.

The number is difficult to process.

Human beings are social animals.

Ordinary prison already removes enormous amounts of freedom.

Solitary confinement removes much of the remaining human contact as well.

DeFriest experienced particularly severe conditions during some periods.

London documented an episode at the Bay County Jail in which DeFriest was held for 11 days in what the filmmaker described as a dungeon-like cell.

According to London's account, he had no clothes, mattress, sheets, toiletries, eating utensils or running water.

Other periods of isolation lasted far longer.

The man who already struggled to navigate social life was being kept away from society almost completely.

What Solitary Can Do to a Human Being

The consequences of prolonged isolation have become the subject of extensive medical and human-rights concern.

Research has associated prolonged solitary confinement with anxiety, depression, hallucinations, sleep disturbances, paranoia, cognitive problems and increased risk of self-harm.

For someone already experiencing serious mental-health difficulties, the risks can be even more concerning.

This creates one of the central contradictions in DeFriest's case.

His behavior made him extraordinarily difficult for correctional institutions to manage.

He escaped.

He attempted escapes.

He manipulated locks.

He accumulated disciplinary violations.

Officials needed to prevent him from getting out.

Isolation offered one method of control.

But advocates argued that the conditions used to control him may also have worsened the psychological problems contributing to his behavior.

Punishment and illness became increasingly difficult to separate.

The Prisoner Who Could Open Almost Anything

DeFriest's reputation grew inside the Florida prison system.

Locks were supposed to control prisoners.

Locks were also exactly the kind of problem his brain was unusually good at solving.

One of the most famous stories involved the master key at Florida State Prison.

According to his attorney, DeFriest studied the pattern of a guard's key and managed to duplicate it.

The idea seems unbelievable until one considers the consistency of descriptions of his mechanical memory.

People familiar with him repeatedly described an ability to look at mechanical objects and retain details other people would miss.

The copied key reportedly allowed him to open cells.

For correctional officials, that talent was a nightmare.

For filmmakers, journalists and psychologists studying his case, it was evidence of a remarkable cognitive ability existing alongside severe behavioral dysfunction.

He could understand a lock.

Understanding the social consequences of opening it was another matter.

The LSD Incident

Of all DeFriest's stories, the LSD episode may be the strangest.

While at Florida State Hospital, he reportedly obtained LSD and placed it into staff coffee.

The apparent plan was to create enough confusion to facilitate an escape.

He later spoke about the incident in documentary footage.

The Guardian reported that the plot failed to produce the escape he wanted.

The episode captures the strange mixture that defined so much of his incarceration:

Ingenuity.

Impulsiveness.

Humor.

Danger.

And an almost compulsive determination to escape regardless of what another attempt might cost him.

Every clever plan potentially produced another criminal charge.

Every successful escape created another opportunity to commit an offense while outside custody.

Every failure could produce disciplinary punishment.

Yet he continued trying.

The Documentary That Changed the Conversation

Filmmaker Gabriel London began working on DeFriest's story more than a decade before the documentary was completed.

Initially, the obvious attraction was the escape artist.

A prisoner who could duplicate keys from memory and repeatedly defeat correctional security sounded like a remarkable character for a film.

But as London investigated, the story changed.

The question was no longer simply:

How did this man keep escaping?

It became:

How did a four-year sentence become this?

London spent years examining DeFriest's records, speaking with people who knew him and interviewing individuals connected to his incarceration.

The resulting documentary, The Mind of Mark DeFriest, was released in 2014.

It brought renewed public attention to the case.

And that attention arrived at an important moment.

A Psychiatrist Reconsiders

One of the documentary's most consequential developments involved Dr. Robert Berland.

Decades earlier, Berland had been the psychiatrist who broke from the majority view regarding DeFriest's competence.

As the documentary revisited the case, Berland reconsidered.

That did not erase the decades that had passed.

But it changed the conversation surrounding DeFriest.

The case was no longer simply about an incorrigible escape artist who refused to obey prison rules.

It was increasingly being discussed as an example of what can happen when serious mental-health issues, criminal punishment and institutional control become tangled together.

Former prison officials also began speaking in support of reconsidering his situation.

Among them was Ron McAndrew, a former warden at Florida State Prison.

DeFriest's wife, Bonnie, whom he met through correspondence, also became an advocate for his release.

Attorney John Middleton worked to persuade authorities that decades of incarceration had been enough.

Then, in 2014, something extraordinary happened.

2085 Becomes 2015

On December 17, 2014, Florida's parole commission reconsidered DeFriest's case.

His presumptive parole release date stood at 2085.

The commissioners voted to move it forward.

Not by five years.

Not by ten.

By approximately seventy years.

The new potential date became March 2015.

A man who had effectively been scheduled to die in prison suddenly had a realistic possibility of leaving.

Associated Press reporting described it as a chance for DeFriest to make his first legal escape.

But even then, freedom was not simple.

Additional sentences complicated his immediate release.

There were other convictions and parole-ineligible terms that still had to be addressed.

So March 2015 did not become the clean ending many supporters had hoped for.

DeFriest remained incarcerated.

But the 2085 date — one of the most shocking symbols of his case — had been dismantled.

Why the Original Viral Version Is Incomplete

The story is often retold online like this:

A 19-year-old takes tools that legally belonged to him.

He gets four years.

He escapes repeatedly.

His sentence becomes 2085.

End of story.

That version is powerful.

It is also incomplete.

The tools were indeed reportedly left to DeFriest in his father's will, but the estate had not completed probate when he took them.

His decades in prison did not result solely from that original act.

He accumulated escape convictions, additional criminal charges and hundreds of disciplinary violations.

And 2085 was not ultimately his final release date.

The parole commission dramatically changed it in 2014.

👉 Please click the Continue Reading button below to keep reading.

News in the same category